Economic InsightEconomic InsightEconomic Insight
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Business News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Investment
  • Stock Market
  • Trading
Reading: Some Basic Math on Why I Think the Recession Likelihood Is Greater than 30%
Share
Font ResizerAa
Economic InsightEconomic Insight
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact
Search
  • Home
  • Business News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Investment
  • Stock Market
  • Trading
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© EconomicsInsight. All Rights Reserved.
Economic Insight > Blog > Economics > Some Basic Math on Why I Think the Recession Likelihood Is Greater than 30%
Some Basic Math on Why I Think the Recession Likelihood Is Greater than 30%
Economics

Some Basic Math on Why I Think the Recession Likelihood Is Greater than 30%

EC Team
Last updated: June 14, 2025 9:18 am
EC Team
Published June 14, 2025
Share
SHARE

Goldman Sachs has reduced the chance of a recession from 35% to 30% in the next 12 months to 45%.Reuters). It is important to note that these forecasts are conditional on future policy paths. These times are less clear than ever.

This is my math.

The current quota set for Ice Summary/Removal is 3000/day. If that pace is achieved (which almost certainly scoops up more than criminals), then about 1.1 million people will be removed a year later.

McKibben, Hogan, Noland (2024) 1.3 million simulation estimates have been removed.

Interestingly, the impact on employment in durable manufacturing seems to be quite large, much larger than that in agriculture, fishing and hunting. The idea that the impact is heavily limited to agricultural employment seems to be wrong in both conditions and absolute numbers (around 800,000 workers in agriculture and around 8 million in durable manufacturing).

The impact of 2026 looks rather modest – about 0.6 ppt deviation from baseline. Please note that the estimate is deportation/removal only. They do do not have Includes customs duties. Assuming the current suspension conditions apply, the lower limit estimate from trade policy is -0.3 PPT for 2026, as China (including past tariffs) holds a universal 10% tariff of around 45%. With retaliation, that -0.9 PPTS.

One point is that these estimates do not incorporate the effects of policy uncertainty. However, policy uncertainty has been found to be important, especially as policy uncertainty measured on the EPU is about four times as high as before Trump. Assuming linearity, Ferrara and Guerin (2018) estimates suggest that unemployment rates are about 2 ppt lower than otherwise. This means almost 1.5 pts lower GDP compared to counterfactuals.

Adding 0.6-0.9 gives you 1.5 ppts. But it adds policy uncertainty (it appears Trump is trying to maximize). This is added to 1.5 PPTS to 1.5 PPTS and totaled to 3 PPTS. If baseline growth is estimated to be 2.3 PPTS (using CBO in January 2025), GDP growth in 2026 will be negative.

So I’m making a conditional forecast here: deportation/removal is nearly 2.1 million, tariffs are universal at least 10%, and policy uncertainty permeates through the economy estimated using historical events, along with retaliation. One point is that policy uncertainty has not risen to these levels these days, with the exception of the first century community pandemic.

Figure 1: EPU (blue, left scale), VIX (red, right scale). The inter-peak recession as defined by Nber is shaded in grey. Light Orange indicates the Trump administration. Source: PolicyUncenterty.com, Cboe via Fred, Nber.

Figure 2: Epu-Trade (blue, left scale), TPU (red, right scale). The inter-peak recession as defined by Nber is shaded in grey. Light Orange indicates the Trump administration. Source: policyuncenternty.com, Iacoviello et al.nber.

Do you rely on forecasts for the first year of recession for the next six months? No, because policy changes implemented over the past five months were well anticipated (at least in the market), so it’s unlikely that normal mechanisms will work.

You Might Also Like

A Timeline for Recession? | Econbrowser

Macroeconomic Implications of Premature Escalation in LA

Realtor.com Reports Most Actively “For Sale” Inventory since December 2019

Leading Index for Commercial Real Estate Increased 1% in April

US State-Level Abortion Regulations: Causes and Effects

TAGGED:BasicGreaterLikelihoodMathrecession
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Popular News
China halts TikTok deal over tariffs: report
Business News

China halts TikTok deal over tariffs: report

EC Team
EC Team
April 5, 2025
Retirement Catch-Up Contributions: What You Need to Know
I’m trying to follow Warren Buffett’s advice with this FTSE 100 stock
Trump’s MAGA Policies of Wealth Destruction
US Supreme Court temporarily halts deportations of Venezuelan migrants
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Categories / Tags

  • Business News
  • Finance
  • Investment
  • Economics
  • Stock Market
  • Trading
  • stock
  • Stocks
  • Trading
  • Trump

About US

Founded with the belief that economic understanding should be accessible to all, we strive to decode complex market movements, break down financial trends, and spotlight business developments that matter — all in a clear, digestible format.
Quick Link
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Contact
Important Links
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

© EconomicsInsight. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?