Economic InsightEconomic InsightEconomic Insight
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Business News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Investment
  • Stock Market
  • Trading
Reading: Of Course We Should Privatize Some Federal Land (but probably won’t)
Share
Font ResizerAa
Economic InsightEconomic Insight
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact
Search
  • Home
  • Business News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Investment
  • Stock Market
  • Trading
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© EconomicsInsight. All Rights Reserved.
Economic Insight > Blog > Economics > Of Course We Should Privatize Some Federal Land (but probably won’t)
Of Course We Should Privatize Some Federal Land (but probably won’t)
Economics

Of Course We Should Privatize Some Federal Land (but probably won’t)

EC Team
Last updated: June 23, 2025 10:55 am
EC Team
Published June 23, 2025
Share
SHARE

The federal government manages an incredible amount of land in the West, including more than half of Oregon, Utah, Nevada, Idaho and Alaska and almost half of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Wyoming. Please see map (PDF). Most of this land is not in the park!!! It’s time for sales to raise some funds and improve the efficiency of land allocation.

Of Course We Should Privatize Some Federal Land (but probably won’t)Conservative Mike Lee There is an invoice This will allow for some sales. wonderful! The only problem with the bill is that it is equipped with restrictions and qualifications. For example, there is a 0.75% cap on total sales. This means that land sales are limited to less than 1% of the total land on federal land, and most rules prohibit sales, so the cap is high. Any permitted sales must be appointed by the state or local government, but must be adjacent to the development area and close to the infrastructure. Additionally, the land can only be used for residential purposes. Lymanstone has a thread More details. As you can see right, a very modest goal is to streamline the land patterns on some checkerboards.

Still, the bill is probably doomed. Simply mentioning the sale of federal land will cause moral panic, as if someone had suggested auctioning out Yellowstone. Assumed conservatives like Romes are fueling this hysteria (e.g. here, here and here). It’s nonsense. here and here Is it the type of land we are actually talking about?– Is there any difference?

As a Matt Darling It was pointed out,This one All Bagel Liberalism from Conservatives– bloated confusion of special interest and proceduralism that strengthens the supply of the patella.

If we cannot sell federal scraps, we have abandoned the pretense of governance of the public interest. We need to build a whole new city –A city of freedom!– No whining about fishing or hunting in scrub scraps. This is exactly the same as the city’s nymbies lobbying to preserve “Historical” parking. Pathetic. The monopoly of federal land is not sacred. Leave it alone. This is where rubber hits the road. If the Magazine means something beyond atmosphere and complaints, it should mean that Americans will cut off the deficit to own and build and unlock the land.

Of course, we need to privatize federal land (probably not).

You Might Also Like

Trump Tariffs Gone Wild | Economic Prism

The Art of the Soft Landing

Freddie Mac House Price Index Mostly Unchanged in March; Up 3.0% Year-over-year

Public and Private Sector Payroll Jobs During Presidential Terms

Make Depressions Great Again | Economic Prism

TAGGED:FederalLandPrivatizewont
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Popular News
Walmart is selling a 0 3-piece luggage set for just , and shoppers say it's 'very handy for organizing items'
Finance

Walmart is selling a $120 3-piece luggage set for just $50, and shoppers say it's 'very handy for organizing items'

EC Team
EC Team
June 7, 2025
Asia markets today June 4 2025
How to watch the Women’s Final Four of March Madness 2025 for free—and without cable
9.6% yield! Here’s the dividend forecast for Glencore shares to 2027!
The Ultimate Guide to TradingView Backtesting
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Categories / Tags

  • Business News
  • Finance
  • Investment
  • Economics
  • Stock Market
  • Trading
  • stock
  • Stocks
  • Trading
  • Trump

About US

Founded with the belief that economic understanding should be accessible to all, we strive to decode complex market movements, break down financial trends, and spotlight business developments that matter — all in a clear, digestible format.
Quick Link
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Contact
Important Links
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

© EconomicsInsight. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?